Search for: "John v. Whole Foods Market Group" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
    For John Bailey of Top Ten Produce, the future for traceability lies in social media. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Walter Olson
It’s not really about food, or calories — it’s about an attempt to increase the power of the state over private enterprise by restricting the power of the private enterprise to market its product. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:14 am
In determining whether a particular packaging is inherently distinctive, the Board considers the factors set forth in Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am by Kristi L. Wolff and Jaclyn M. Metzinger
PFAS  FDA issued new test results regarding PFAS levels in a range of foods and shared an update on the voluntary market phase-out of certain short-chain PFAS used in food packaging. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
… While this text tries the limits of the modicum of creativity necessary for a work to be copyrightable, I find that taken as a whole it comes within the purview of the Copyright Act. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
If an attorney or law firm has procured clients through marketing efforts that run afoul of the barratry statute, it would be in its interest to have the issued resolved in a private forum, and not create a public record, but does that advance the state's public policy? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
  While that observation is food for further thought, it isn’t germane to what Yates may mean for King v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
McClung, 379 U.S. 274 (1964) (Commerce power extended to application of anti-discrimination statute to a local restaurant that served almost purely local customers where its food was ordered in interstate commerce); Perez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a high-stakes legal battle between a brand-name drug company and a group of companies making generic drugs – Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:01 pm by Steve McConnell
Marketing documents typically talk about spending "against" certain groups. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]