Search for: "Johnson v. Vidal"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
The four principal questions arising were: whether the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 am
Contents include:Part OneMichael V. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
Mr Justice Tugendhat yesterday gave judgment in the case of Vidal-Hall and Others v Google Inc [2014] EWHC 13 (QB). [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
Vidal. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Vidal v. [read post]
30 Apr 2005, 6:41 pm
Hay algunas bases de distinción para decir que en realidad no, y al respecto me remito a mi reseña del caso Virginia v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
The Directive does not require proof of pecuniary damage, but it was held in Johnson –v- Medical Defence Union that the DPA does.) [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm
There were also three “damages” only trials: Sloutsker v Romanova, Johnson v Steele and ReachLocal v Bennett. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States permitting application of the “modified categorical approach,” or rather, whether “touches or strikes” is a single indivisible element requiring the categorical approach and a finding under Johnson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:50 am
Johnson, 129 S. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
The petition titled “Call to Resist Illegitimate Authority” published in the New York Review of Books and the New Republic in October 1967, and “widely circulated thereafter,” “was one of the most important documents in the intellectuals’ campaign against President Johnson and the Vietnam War,” leading “directly to the establishment of the militant antiwar organization called Resist. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
In other news according to the UK Supreme Court registry the appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google has been “withdrawn following agreement between the parties”. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
It’s hard to tell, but Johnson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Last up is Shabo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Paul v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
Smith, D-Queens, joined Senator Craig Johnson, D-Port Washington, at a Mineola news conference to announce a measure that would prohibit registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school, park or day-care center, the precise residence requirement contained in the local law that was stuck down. [read post]
