Search for: "Jones v. Army Fleet Support" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Instead, he concluded that the Respondent's unilateral action was unlawful because the Respondent hired a workforce consisting solely of its predecessor's Union-represented employees and that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Jones, who owns and manages at least eight properties with at least 19 rental units, is responsible for 14 violations of federal lead-based paint disclosure laws in four [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
Dan Friedman reports for Mother Jones. [read post]