Search for: "Judith Schaeffer"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
"Senate Leaders on Target to Break Obstruction Record": Judith E. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:53 pm
Schaeffer. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:54 am
Supreme Court on Monday": Judith E. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:48 am
" Judith E. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:02 pm
" Brianne Gorod and Judith E. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:08 pm
By Doug Kendall, President, and Judith Schaeffer, Vice President, Constitutional Accountability Center As ACS members know, our Constitution is under attack from tea partiers and other self-professed “constitutional conservatives” who have claimed the document as their own and distorted it to support their ideological agenda. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am
” At Slate, Judith Schaeffer looks back at comments about Loving v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:45 am
” Judith Schaeffer continues the Constitutional Accountability Center’s analysis of the Roberts Court in its tenth Term with a look at LGBT rights and same-sex marriage, while in an op-ed for The Courier-Journal she commemorates the forty-eighth anniversary of the oral arguments in Loving v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Judith E. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
" Earlier this week, Judith E. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Ryan Anderson – The Heritage Foundation Erwin Chemerinsky – University of California, Irvine Mike Dorf – Cornell University Kyle Duncan – Duncan PLLC and counsel to amici supporting respondents Chris Green – University of Mississippi Steve Sanders – Indiana University Judith Schaeffer – Constitutional Accountability Center Gene Schaerr – Law offices of Gene Schaerr and counsel to amici supporting the respondents Paul Smith –… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
In an op-ed for HamptonRoads.com, Judith Schaeffer praises the recent decision by a federal district court judge striking down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage (which Lyle covered for this blog), focusing in particular on the court’s reliance on the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am
Schaeffer at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:44 am
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Judith Schaeffer discusses Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) for the Boston Globe, Lee Saunders for The Hill, Raul Reyes for NBC News, Judith Schaeffer for The Huffington Post, Joan McCarter for Daily Kos, Rebecca Leber for Mother Jones and Dahlia Lithwick for Slate. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:13 am
Commentary and analysis on the case come from Marty Lederman at Balkinization (with a follow-up post yesterday), Elizabeth Wydra at The Huffington Post, and Judith Schaeffer at The Huffington Post. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
” At the Huffington Post, Brianne Gorod and Judith Schaeffer argue that, although Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore “may not want to recognize that the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
Commentary comes from Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times, NPR’s To the Point (audio), Steven Mazie in an explainer for The Economist, Amy Davidson at The New Yorker, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Erwin Chemerinsky at ACSblog, Janson Wu at ACSblog, Suzanne Goldberg at ACSblog, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, David Fontana and Donald Braman in The Washington Post, Judith Schaeffer in USA Today, Gene Schaerr at The Daily Signal (who had another post there earlier… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
Commentary and analysis of Friday’s order come from Richard Socarides of The New Yorker, Ilya Shapiro at Forbes, Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice, Steve Sanders at ACSblog, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Brianne Gorod and Judith Schaeffer at The New Republic, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Arthur Leonard at his eponymous blog. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
In The Huffington Post, Judith Schaeffer contends that, “as we celebrate the anniversary of Obergefell, it’s critical to remember that the short-handed Supreme Court is now in a position in which it may not be able to issue decisions for our nation on fundamental rights and other important legal issues. [read post]
