Search for: "Justice v. Tian"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2020, 4:27 am
The Chinese court’s rejection does not violate natural justice. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:23 am
| Sisvel v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:15 am
SpecialKat Tian Lv has the story. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:31 pm
CommentJianjun Gao, Delimitation of the Extended Continental Shelf in Somalia v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:37 am
V. involving an infringement claim of Eli Lily’s pemetrexed patents. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
The CJEU delivered two rulings recently, in PTC Therapeutics International v EMA (C-175/18 P) and MSD Animal Health Innovation and Intervet International v EMA case (C-178/18 P). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
Ready to celebrate New Year's EveSunday SurprisesInternKat Tian Lu recaps forthcoming events, Geneva Internet Dispute Resolution Policies 1.0 project and the UK IPO call for IP valuation experts.A TITANIC trade mark disputeGuest Kat Rosie Burbidge analyzes the case Property Renaissance Ltd (t/a Titanic Spa) v Stanley Dock Hotel Ltd (t/a Titanic Hotel Liverpool) & Ors, [2016] EWHC 3103 (Ch). [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm
Rose also reported on Jones v Irmac Roads ([2022] EWHC 495 (IPEC)), a decision delivered by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 12:42 am
Tian Tian Mayimin, who argued for defendant Aphrodite Cosmetics, won for best oral presentation. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:15 pm
CopyrightAsia Correspondent Tian Lu reported on an interesting copyright case in Japan, relating to artworks each comprising of a telephone booth being used as a goldfish tank.PatentsThe finely-tuned balance to be struck between novelty, insufficiency, and obviousness in deciding when to file a second-medical use patent application came under consideration of GuestKat Rose Hughes in relation to the Canadian Federal Court's approach in the recent case of Teva v… [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am
In Rat Pack v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Tian Lu reports that China amends trade mark and unfair competition law to tackle trade mark squatting and enforcement issues. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 3:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
No problem – here is the 130th edition of Never Too Late.Book review: Maintenance time and the industry development of patentsInternKat Tian reviewed Dr. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:25 am
Department of Justice U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:55 pm
Sky v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am
The three-step Coco v AN Clark test was applied to the dispute. [read post]
