Search for: "K & B Investments NO. 2, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 3:13 am
Under Rule 257(b)(1) of Regulation A, Form 1-K is the annual report now required to be filed by Tier 2 companies that conducted their offerings under Regulation A+. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
These types of 401(k) plans can allow you to invest in alternative investments like real estate. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:16 am
Each of the siblings received K-1s identifying them as “members. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:56 pm
In K&K Screw Products, LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:00 pm
Recently, in an August 30, 2012 letter (which was subsequently released publicly), the large international law firm K&L Gates LLP provided a legal opinion to AngelList LLC, the operator of an online angel investment platform, that it (a) is not required to register as a broker-dealer under federal securities laws and (b) companies posting information to accredited investors on the AngelList website are not engaged in a general solicitation in… [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm
K&E Real Estate Investments, 2014 NCBC 56, Judge Bledsoe outlined how a derivative action plaintiff can recover attorneys' fees. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:59 am
On November 3, 2011, ALJ Robert K. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
Finally, Blackwater isn’t allowed to use any ITAR exemptions from licensing, such as the spare parts exemption in section 123.16(b)(2). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
§ 1108(b)(8) if: (1) the transaction involves selling or purchasing fund interests; (2) the trust company is not overcompensated; and (3) the transaction is expressly permitted by an authoritative party. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 2:11 am
Filed February 23, 2007--Opinion by Judge Deborah K. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:46 am
Furman, John Wilson and Doug Elsbeck, King & Spalding LLP, on Sunday, August 29, 2021 Tags: Incentives, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation 2021 Say on Pay and Proxy Results Posted by Todd Sirras, Justin Beck, and Austin Vanbastelaer, Semler Brossy LLC, on Monday, August 30, 2021 Tags: Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Say… [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
MCC and WC made initial investments in a 3:1 ratio of $581,562 and $193,854 resulting in a 75%/25% membership split as reported in their Schedule K-1s included with the LLC’s 1999 and 2000 tax returns. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Curran, Ryan K. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
However, his disclosures include many businesses including: 1) Olinde Brothers Properties – a commercial building partnership; 2) Olinde Financial Group – his d/b/a for brokerage activity; 3) Olinde Investment Holdings LLC; 4) The Massad Olinde Group; 5) Alpha Consulting Group; 6) Prciniple Matters, LLC – a radio program; 7) Avive Nutraceuticals, LLC – partner and board member; 8) Olinde Management, LLC… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:53 am
It is important to remember that if a Rule 506(c) fails, the company cannot simply switch to using Rule 506(b) or Section 4(2) private placement because Rule 506(b) or Section 4(2) do not permit general solicitation or advertising. 4. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
(A Systematic Literature Review of Socially Reposnible Investing (SRI) and Environmental Social Givernnace (ESG), p- 25). [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
Tec Investments, LLC, Delaware Co. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BLMIS) was a Ponzi scheme led to its liquidation under the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA).1 A SIPA liquidation is designed to collect “customer property” for ratable distribution among customers based on their “net equity” — investments minus withdrawals (i.e., loss of principal).2 SIPA largely incorporates the Bankruptcy Code and allows the SIPA trustee to recover property transferred by… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:45 pm
Enterprise Products Holdings LLC, 2012 WL 34442, at *12 (Del. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
Respondents opposed Saxon’s motion on the basis that 1) they needed more discovery; and 2) Saxon had not demonstrated the requisite nexus between Motorola’s engineering investments and the patented technology. [read post]
