Search for: "K.H. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 9:38 am by Diana L. Skaggs
  The Cabinet does not allege that the children have been subjected to direct acts of abuse or neglect, but rather K.H. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
–H. does not advocate an independent state constitutional analysis but instead argues our cases articulate a First Amendment analysis distinct from that applied in Clark. [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
Soon after, while K.H. and M.H. were not at home, their house was burglarized again. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
When asked what types of things she does in the United States with her mother, G.H. could only identify going to the mall and had to be prompted to identify more activities such as playing games. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:24 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Dinkel asserts that "[t]he victim of a rape does not voluntarily engage in sexual intercourse with the perpetrator. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
COA also noted that its opinion does not prohibit the father from pursuing future visitation with his daughter. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
’s testimony was supported by K.H., a Rastafarian with a background in religious studies. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by G.A. Napier
That is a pretty heavy hand to play to coerce the signing of a plan that the parent likely does not agree with but may be held to regardless. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
K.H. (1994), 1994 CanLII 17267 (NB CA), 146 N.B.R. (2d) 372, fire “no matter how well planned, is often erratic and unpredictable and gives rise to unforeseen consequences” (at paragraph 6). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
Marion County Department of Child Services (NFP) In the Matter of A.H., K.H. and D.H., Children in Need of Services; J.H. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, when the government is acting in a special role that lets it impose extra speech restrictions—as educator, employer, landlord, regulator of the airwaves, and the like—it may have some extra power to compel speech as well.[27] The question we'll discuss in this Essay will generally be: When does a government action become a speech compulsion subject to serious First Amendment scrutiny, usually akin to the scrutiny applied to similar speech restrictions? [read post]