Search for: "Khan v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2022, 10:01 am
Khan (nor for Jonathan Kanter's Antitrust Division of the DOJ). [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:33 am
London Borough of Waltham Forest v Khan [2017] UKUT 153 (LC) It has always been generally assumed that local authorities have a fairly limited discretion when granting a licence under a selective licensing scheme created under Part 3, Housing Act 2004. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:31 pm
In Vernor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:56 am
Khan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:04 pm
One answer may be found in a decision by EDNY Judge Gleeson, United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
Unlike in FTC v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
" Boren,807 F.3d at 104 (quoting Khan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:42 am
If, as the Supreme Court recently held in Holder v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
It remains to be seen whether IP holders as foreign investors attempt to use this as a forum where they get another option for challenging otherwise final decisions of national courts. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
News broke two days ago that US Attorney General Eric Holder is stepping down. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 11:50 am
Sharif was found guilty under section 9(a)(v) of Pakistan’s National Accountability Ordinance. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT INC. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 4:37 am
Khan, No. 15-40446 (5th Cir. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:17 pm
As void it is open to third party challenge by a subsequent encumbrancer, rather than, if it was just voidable, only open to challenge by the mortgagor -Merhban Khan v Makhna (1930) 57 Ind. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am
After discussing how to define "international IP law", Grosse Ruse-Khan elaborates on several fresh approaches for research, both in public and private international law of intellectual property. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Irfan Khan is suing the federal government for malicious prosecution. [read post]
