Search for: "Kip Werking"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2012, 10:01 am
Today, Kip Werking argues at IP Watchdog that the algorithm requirement (i.e., Lemley's solution) makes "no sense" because (a) under Federal Circuit law, form ("the location of the algorithm within the patent document") matters over substance, and (b) the algorithm requirement is "arbitrary" and "does not specify what level of abstraction . . . one must overcome. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Werking shares how he reached this conclusion using the PatentCore™ database. 5) Patent Docs: U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Werking shares how he reached this conclusion using the PatentCore™ database. 5) Patent Docs: U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:10 am
Speaking of after final practice, there is an interesting study authored by Kip Werking (posted on IPWatchdog) that explains BPAI success rates for applicants are closer to 75% rather than the 33% reported by the USPTO. [read post]
