Search for: "Knowles v. Google, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2018, 6:47 am
This was the procedure adopted in the case of Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) – where permission was granted but the injunction application was put over to the trial of the action. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
On 10 March 2022, a statement was read in open court before HHJ Lewis in settlement of Anderson v Google Ireland. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Bindel v PinkNews Media Group Ltd, heard 26 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 21-23 and 26 April 2021 (Nicklin J) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
EU On 7 April 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered his opinion in TU, RE v Google on the question of the specific function performed by search engines in relation to Articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which set out respectively the right to respect for private life, the right to protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information and freedom to conduct business. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
Google LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
A website blocking order was granted in the case of Columbia Pictures Industries Inc and Ors v British Telecommunications Plc and Ors [2021] EWHC 2799 (Ch). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
On 17 May 2019 Julian Knowles J heard an appeal in the case of Desporte v Bull. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
Google’s artificial intelligence arm DeepMind received the data to test an app called Streams, Sky News reports. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in the case of Lloyd v Google. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Internet and Social Media There is a post by Michael Douglas on the Bennett+Co website entitled Suing Google, Facebook or Twitter for defamation. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
Google has announced plans to update Google Analytics’ programming to address user privacy and regulatory compliance demands. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Press Gazette investigates why the Mail Online systematically appears lower in Google search results despite being one of the biggest English language websites in the world, prompted by the Mail’s accusations that Google is deliberately downgrading its content. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
Canada’s proposed legislation would force platforms like Google parent Alphabet Inc and Meta to negotiate commercial deals and pay Canadian news publishers for their content, part of a broader global trend to make tech firms pay for news. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
A recent trademark dispute between fitness-tech company iFIT inc. and lingerie retailer Victoria Secret shows that any everyday word (here, “SWEAT”) can qualify for trademark protection. [read post]
