Search for: "Kyocera Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 8:04 pm
The ITC determined that Qualcomm Incorporated infringed Broadcom Corporation â [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:04 pm
The ITC determined that Qualcomm Incorporated infringed Broadcom Corporation â [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:58 am by Tom Smith
According to Peter Morici, an economics professor at the University of Maryland (and the bow-tied star of TV commercials for Kyocera office equipment) the problems lie in five key areas. 1) Poorly enforced trade agreements that allow China to manipulate its currency and export more goods to the United States, costing U.S. jobs. 2) Counterproductive energy policies that reduce domestic production, and therefore jobs, and cause more oil to be imported. 3) Burdensome regulations and taxation,… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:10 am
., HTC Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Spectrum L.P., Kyocera Corporation, Boost Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and ZTE (USA), Inc. filed a motion to stay pending resolution of an inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:23 am by Eric Turkewitz
” When Kyocera declined to pay Stein $300,000 to represent the corporation in part because it doesn’t want to be associated with that belief, it violated Stein’s constitutional right to $300,000. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:05 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 5,809,336 (the ‘336 patent): Acer Inc. of Taiwan Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America of Bellevue, Washington Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. of China Huawei North America of Plano, Texas Kyocera Corporation… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: • Acer Inc. of Taiwan • Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California • Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington • Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York • Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland • Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas • Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas • HTC… [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:10 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Activision Blizzard, Inc. of Santa Monica, California Canon, Inc. of Japan Canon USA, Inc. of Lake Success, New York Jakks Pacific, Inc. of Malibu, California Kyocera Communications, Inc. of San Diego, California LEGO A/S dba LEGO Group of Denmark LEGO Systems, Inc. of Enfield, Connecticut Lenovo (United States), Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina Lenovo Group… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 This, the 54th weekly summary, is what you've missed:* Letter from AmeriKat: No Supreme Court rescue for Google in Oracle dispute and Microsoft/Kyocera settlementThe US Supreme Court dismisses Google's writ of certiorari to re-examine the 2014 decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in favour of Oracle regarding API copyright protection, as Microsoft and Kyocera make peace and end their smartphone patent lawsuits. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:32 am by Mi Patente
La investigación está basada en una queja presentada por las compañías Technology Properties Limited LLC y Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC de Cupertino, California; y Patriot Scientific Corporation de Carlsbad, California, anunció la comisión en un comunicado. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:44 pm by Alex Gasser
Corporation of San Diego, California • Sharp Corporation of Japan • Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey • Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC of Foster City, California • Sony Corporation of Japan • Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York • Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California • Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA), Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 54 [week ending on Sunday 5 July] - Google v Oracle and Microsoft/Kyocera settlement | GC and Nagoya | Life Science IP Summit 2015 | (Kat)onomics of patents | Case T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM | Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM v Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Multi Time Machine, Inc., v… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd | Non-traditional trade marks in Japan.Never too late… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC & Another v WPMC Ltd… [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(Internet Cases) (Ars Technica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) DoJ Antitrust division shifts to more aggressive approach (Patent Baristas)   US Patents – Decisions BPAI affirms ‘apparatus’ 101 rejection: Ex Parte Snyder (12:01 Tuesday)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Fractus – Fractus sues cell phone manufacturers Samsung, LG, RIM, Pantech, Kyocera, Palm, HTC, UTStarcom and Sanyo for infringement of… [read post]