Search for: "L-3 Communications Holdings Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 5:58 am by Keith Herting
The court sent the cases against CACI International Inc. and L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:37 pm
Last week, a jury in federal court in Atlanta awarded Lockheed Martin $37.3 million in a trade secret case against L-3 Communications Corp. and a subsidiary.Each of these cases will likely be appealed and will perhaps be settled. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 12:44 pm by Brittany E. Grierson
Our Lady of Lourdes Mem’l Hosp., Inc., the New York Supreme Court reminded litigants that while litigation holds are generally protected by the attorney-client privilege or under the attorney work product doctrine, a preliminary showing of spoliation of evidence may compel the production of an offending party’s litigation hold documentation. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 12:44 pm by Brittany E. Grierson
Our Lady of Lourdes Mem’l Hosp., Inc., the New York Supreme Court reminded litigants that while litigation holds are generally protected by the attorney-client privilege or under the attorney work product doctrine, a preliminary showing of spoliation of evidence may compel the production of an offending party’s litigation hold documentation. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 12:44 pm by Brittany E. Grierson
Our Lady of Lourdes Mem’l Hosp., Inc., the New York Supreme Court reminded litigants that while litigation holds are generally protected by the attorney-client privilege or under the attorney work product doctrine, a preliminary showing of spoliation of evidence may compel the production of an offending party’s litigation hold documentation. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:24 am
$1,557,116Kathleen Karelis L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
” That is the issue which the Ontario Court of Appeal recently addressed in L-3 Communication Spar Aerospace Limited v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:38 am by Tom Heintzman
”  That is the issue which the Ontario Court of Appeal recently addressed in L-3 Communication Spar Aerospace Limited v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
” Compendium §924.2(A); see also Chosun Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]