Search for: "Land Road Transfer Co"
Results 1 - 20
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
Canwell Estate Co Ltd v Smith Brothers Farms Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 237; [2012] WLR (D) 59 “The prohibition introduced by the Rentcharges Act 1977 against creation of new rentcharges by a rent owner against a landowner did not apply to the creation of a rentcharge incorporated in a transfer made in 1990 the amount of which was calculated annually as a fixed proportion of the claimant’s costs, expenses and outgoings incurred in fulfilling its obligations under a covenant to… [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 12:00 pm
That’s a big transfer of land, say officials at the Minnesota Lakes and Rivers Advocates. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 U.S. 439 (1988)(O’Connor, J.), holding that a federal plan to build a road over and permit logging on land a tribe held sacred and used for religious worship, did not infringe upon the tribe’s free exercise of religion. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
ALC Corp then transferred all of its land abutting the DE Property to the State of Louisiana and sold several parcels of land bordering Herman Dupuis Road. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:23 am
He co-founded ShaleTest, offering to conduct testing of air and water around oil and gas sites. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
In fact, having a native co driver who knows the road rules can save lives when you’re fresh off the boat from the UK. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 7:23 am
The new government has laid out a broad transitional justice agenda and even co-sponsored a U.N. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Otsego Co.), the plaintiff corporate landowner entered into two leases in 2007 granting the lessee the right to explore, develop, produce and market oil and gas resources on approximately 380 acres of plaintiff’s land. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:28 am
Regarding the casino, Manale said the city approved land use rights for 'a place of amusement'. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 9:30 am
The detailed report noted the persistence of practices such as “forced technology transfer” and “cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Shepherd signed and gave to Mendelsohn the required transfer papers and the only set of keys. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am
Security Trust Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
At the bottom, the paper stated that “seller will transfer its tenantcy [sic] to the buyer,” but did not further identify the tenancy to be transferred. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
At the bottom, the paper stated that “seller will transfer its tenantcy [sic] to the buyer,” but did not further identify the tenancy to be transferred. [read post]
