Search for: "Lawyer Campbell v. United State" Results 1 - 20 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 10:11 pm
Here is the abstract:The United States Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:53 pm
Here is the Abstract:The United States Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
On this view, while Section One identified the citizens of the United States, it did not confer new rights of citizenship. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:48 am by Legal Talk Network
Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm by Tim Clancy
Execution of people with documented mental retardation is unlawful in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:43 pm
Westchester based Criminal Defense Law Firm, Tilem & Campbell, is following with great interest the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:27 am
Matthew Connolly and Gavin Campbell Black, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 19-CR-3806 / January 27, 2022)New York Stock Promoter Sentenced to Prison for “Pump and Dump” Securities Fraud Scheme (DOJ Release)... [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am by INFORRM
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today handed down its long awaited judgment in the case of MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04). [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm by Shawn R. Dominy
The Clark Court relied on the United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm by Steve Hall
For the third time in 16 years and the second time in two, the Orleans Parish district attorney’s office must explain itself before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]