Search for: "Li v. Strickland"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Writing for a majority of the Court, Justice O’Connor in Strickland v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
Chaidez, this time deciding the issue of whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 9:04 am
Strickland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
In Banos v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:35 am
"Writing in the 1958 case of Trop v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
The standards, set in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court recognized in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
He concluded that the burden for seeking attorney eyes only (AEO) lies with the party seeking it, and had not been met in this instance. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Williams v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
In Donnie Johnson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Let’s dispense with Missouri v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Lara v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
State, 1 Ga. 243 (1846), reaffirmed, Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am
But Lee’s conviction should still stand, the government argued, because the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Further, the court found that the Florida Supreme Court unreasonably applied Strickland in holding that the deficiency was not prejudicial. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
One mea culpa for our last installment: Turns out we were Telling Lies when we said that False Claims Act (FCA) case AT&T, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
” That's certainly true, but provides absolutely no guidance for the court in fashioning a rule or remedy, and therein lies the big issue in Lafler v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
