Search for: "Limited Brands Direct Fulfillment, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am by Caitlin Stickler, Olswang LLP
In what should come as a welcome decision for brand owners, the Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd unanimously overturning the decision of the Court of Appeal, and restoring the first instance order of Kitchin J. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Jordan Brunner
” The directive labeled all Kaspersky software as constituting an “information security risk,” and directing all executive branch officials to “identify Kaspersky-branded products ... provide plans to discontinue use of Kaspersky-branded products, and ... unless directed otherwise by DHS in light of new information, begin to remove Kaspersky-branded products. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:29 pm by Isobel Taylor (AU)
The post No safe harbour: Online platforms face choppy waters when it comes to copyright infringement appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:29 pm by Isobel Taylor (AU)
The post No safe harbour: Online platforms face choppy waters when it comes to copyright infringement appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:47 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Amazon is generally involved in three types of transactions: the direct sale of its own Amazon-branded products to consumers; the sale of a product directly from a vendor to a consumer, with Amazon merely allowing the vendor to advertise the product and the consumer to order it; and the sale of a product from a vendor to a customer, with Amazon fulfilling the transaction by holding the product in its warehouse and shipping it to the consumer. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Tom DiStefano got his quota-fulfilling bulk email patent, 6,631,400, when the PTO was still grinding out junk patents. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Indeed, many religions teach that proselytizing about their faith to nonbelievers is essential, because nonbelievers simply need to be shown the error of their ways and be directed toward “truth. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:09 pm by Robert P. Merten III and Carley Roberts
The authors anticipate continued challenges by the business community to state attempts to limit the protections of PL 86-272, and time will tell whether and to what extent these challenges prove successful. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 9:28 am
The condition that the repackaging of the pharmaceutical product, either by reboxing the product and re-applying the trade mark or by applying a label to the packaging containing the product, be necessary for its further commercialisation in the importing Member State, as one of the conditions which, if fulfilled, prevent the proprietor under Article 7(2) of Directive 89/104, as amended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area, from opposing such commercialisation, is… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:45 am
48/09 P Lego Juris A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and MEGA Brands, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
For more information on wine or alcohol law, direct shipping, licensing, or other legal matters please contact Lindsey Zahn. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
But we are happy to see decisions of interest to this blog’s readers issuing once again, including a brand new opinion from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]