Search for: "Luxottica Retail North America Inc."
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2016, 8:31 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., 803 F.3d 425 (9th [...] [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:42 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., --- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, 2021 WL 2451109, A157657 (Ct. [read post]
Ninth Circuit’s Pro-PAGA Decision Is Not the Death Knell for Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
1 Oct 2015, 7:34 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., the Ninth Circuit ruled that an employee cannot waive the right to bring a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) through an arbitration agreement or any other means. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:50 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. (9th Cir. 9/28/15) ___ F.3d ___, the Ninth Circuit has held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) does not preempt the holding of Iskanian v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:14 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., No. 13-55184, and ruled that the eyewear retailer violated the Iskanian rule by forcing its employees to waive representative PAGA claims in its arbitration agreements. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:32 am
But Thompson Hine is currently registered to lobby for Luxottica Retail North America Inc., a subsidiary of Oakley’s parent company, Luxottica Group SpA. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:56 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:35 am
Luxottica Retail North America Inc. pits a class of salaried retail, lab, and general managers against their employer Lenscrafters. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:05 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, 803 F.3d 425 (9th Cir. 2015), that the FAA does not preempt California’s rule that an employee’s right to pursue a PAGA action cannot be waived through an arbitration agreement. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:05 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., No. 13-55184; Hopkins v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm
Luxottica Retail North America Inc., 803 F.3d 425, 431-40 (9th Cir. 2015), (covered in our October 7, 2015, blog article), agreed that a PAGA waiver is void based on public policy and that the Iskanian rule was not preempted by the FAA. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:44 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:13 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. (2015 9th Cir.) 803 F.3d 425, contended that California law permits arbitration of PAGA claims. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., 803 F.3d 425, 434 (9th Cir. 2015) the appellate court explained: “The California Supreme Court’s decision in Iskanian expresses no preference regarding whether individual PAGA claims are litigated or arbitrated. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:57 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:03 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., September 28, 2015, Smith, M., Jr.). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
Luxottica Retail North America, 803 F.3d 425 (9th Cir. 2015), the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a split 2-1 decision adopting the Iskanian Rule. [read post]
