Search for: "MARSH USA INC." Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 2:10 pm by Liskow & Lewis
 By Andrew Wooley           The Supreme Court of Texas’ recent decision in Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:10 pm by Andrew Wooley
 By Andrew Wooley           The Supreme Court of Texas’ recent decision in Marsh USA Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:18 pm by Robert Wood
Even after the Marsh USA case, some noncompete agreements are still unenforceable in Texas. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:03 am by Daily Record Staff
Middle River Hotel Partners, LLP is the development group and owner of the hotel, which will be managed by USA Management II, Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm by Russell Cawyer
Last summer, I detailed the Dallas Court of Appeals' decision in Marsh USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:28 am by Colleen McGushin
On April 9, the Texas Supreme Court granted review in Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm by David J. Clark
(“Aon”) brought suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Marsh USA Inc., Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:33 am
My good friend Mike Maslanka has an excellent post up on his Work Matters Blog this week discussing the Texas Supreme Court's granting review of  Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:30 am by Ashley Smith
Marsh, USA, Inc., the court was posed with the question: When an insurance broker shares a ‘special relationship’ with its client, is the broker subject to an extra-contractual enhanced duty of care requiring the broker to advise the client about the amount of coverage prudently needed to meet its complete insurance needs? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Ruling that an employer could be vicariously liable on a tort claim by an individual who was injured in a vehicular collision with an employee after hours, a California appeals court found the “required vehicle” exception to the going and coming rule applicable (Moradi v Marsh USA, Inc, CalCtApp, September 17, 2013). [read post]