Search for: "MCA Construction, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; GEFFEN RECORDS, INC., a corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MCA RECORDS, INC.; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORP.; ISLAND RECORDS, INC.; MOTOWN RECORD CO.; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK MUSIC CORP., on behalf of themselves and all… [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:14 pm
MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 902 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Rogers, 875 F.2d at 999). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by Andrew Frisch
Discussing the MCA exemption generally the court explained: One exemption to this general rule is Section 13(b)(1) of the Act. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by Andrew Frisch
Discussing the MCA exemption generally the court explained: One exemption to this general rule is Section 13(b)(1) of the Act. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am by Russell Spivak
Judge Griffith similarly dismissed Jawad’s second age-based argument, which the Court interpreted to mean “that no provision of the MCA can apply to juveniles, leaving him free to bring his damages action. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Doug Cornelius
 Kelly was spot on regarding his analysis of the siloed nature of Boeing’s design and construction process that caused or contributed to the catastrophic failure of the 737 Max due to the failure of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS). [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
MCA Records, 58 N.Y.2d 482, 489 [1983] ). [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
§ 635.110(b) because the Lewis Law's bond penalty for noncompliance could restrict competition by deterring some contractors from bidding on City construction projects. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]