Search for: "MEDIA COURTHOUSE, ET AL" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
Humanitarian Law Project et al. (08-1498), and Humanitarian Law Project et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:02 am
We were there for proceedings in Khadr, which took place in the hilltop courthouse, and, in the new courtroom, in Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al., the 9/11 case about which I wrote here.Ever escorted, on occasion we NGO observers ventured elsewhere on the base. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
The record before the Court includes a published version of the Short Story and a DVD copy of Disturbia.Plaintiff has also submitted thousands of pages of exhibits, including: expert reports; previous drafts of the screenplay; references to and copies of media articles and film critics' reviews likening Disturbia to the Rear Window film; and many lists, charts and DVDs purporting to identify similarities among the Short Story, the Rear Window film, and Disturbia. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:17 pm by David Post
 POST On October 18th, at the federal courthouse in downtown Manhattan, the US Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Viacom et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:30 am
In other words, the ability of a handful of administrators and bureaucrats to make decisions on criminal culpability that can alter the rest of a student's life, without any of the protections afforded by the rules of criminal procedure, the laws of evidence, or the Constitution's guarantees of the right to remain silent et. al is terrifying and I would argue violative of the Constitution. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
In other words, the ability of a handful of administrators and bureaucrats to make decisions on criminal culpability that can alter the rest of a student's life, without any of the protections afforded by the rules of criminal procedure, the laws of evidence, or the Constitution's guarantees of the right to remain silent et. al is terrifying and I would argue violative of the Constitution. [read post]