Search for: "MEDTRONIC, INC., a Minnesota corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
In In re Medtronic Inc., Shareholder Litigation., 2016 WL 6066253 (Minn. 2017), the Supreme Court of Minnesota affirmed in part, and reversed in part Kenneth Steiner’s (“Respondent”) claims asserted in a class-action challenge to Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:23 pm
On May 28, the Department of Justice announced that Medtronic, Inc., the Minnesota-based medical device company, had agreed to pay $9.9 to resolve allegations originally brought by a qui tam whistleblower that the company paid kickbacks to physicians for prescribing its products. [read post]
Sprint Fidelis Litigation Update: 225 Lawsuits Filed In State Courts And Federal MDL As Of June 2008
3 Jul 2008, 2:20 pm
District Court for the District of Minnesota pursuant to the MDL rules. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:55 am
Cellspin Soft, Inc., No. 19-400 (eligibility) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc. and Saracare Corp., 5:11-CV-144/RS-CJK, 2011 WL 2473318 (N.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
” Medtronic removed the case to federal district court based on diversity of citizenship; Biotronik was an Oregon corporation and Medtronic a Minnesota corporation. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
Dollens, president and CEO, Guidant Corporation. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:20 pm
That year, a pre-Obama Supreme Court decided a case of corporate judicial activism at its worst - Reigle vs. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
Medtronic, Inc., 678 F. 2d 93, 94-95 (9th Cir. 1982)). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:19 pm
Long Haul Inc., et al., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:11 am
Medtronic, Inc., it impliedly recognized that a defendant’s interference with a contract may be justified by reliance on the advice of counsel. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:08 pm
Medtronic Inc. et al. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 5:51 pm
Cloud, Minnesota, has agreed to pay $500,000. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 750 F.2d 1227, 1233 n.13 (4th Cir. 1984) (applying South Carolina law); Adamson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Medtronic, Inc., U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am
Paul Pioneer Press article (here), on July 2, 2014, a shareholder of Minnesota-based Medtronic has filed a class action lawsuit in Hennepin County District Court challenging the company’s planned $42.9 billion acquisition of Ireland-based Covidien, which will result in a new company to be called Medtronic PLC. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Bayer Corporation, 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Contech Arch Technologies, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Ill. 1987).Indiana: Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. [read post]
