Search for: "MGA Insurance Company, Inc. "
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm
MGA Entm't Inc., 2:12-cv-05654-DOC-RNB (C.D. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:29 am
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has fired MGA Entertainment Inc., maker of the Bratz doll — again. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:28 pm
MGA Insurance Co., Inc., Fla: Dist. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:10 am
Law.com is reporting that Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, which helped win an $88.5 million jury verdict for MGA Entertainment Inc. in a dispute over the rights to the highly profitable Bratz doll line, has asked for permission to fire its client in a related dispute on the ground that the company owes more than $1.2 million in attorney fees. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
And re-read this ‘graph: MGA Entertainment has spent $63 million in fees since 2004 defending a lawsuit by Mattel Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:54 pm
And re-read this ‘graph: MGA Entertainment has spent $63 million in fees since 2004 defending a lawsuit by Mattel Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
In a decision certain to please both MGA and its lawyers, the Southern District of California ruled that MGA's insurers had a duty to defend MGA in its litigation against Mattel. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company have filed a declaratory action for those fees and MGA is expected to oppose the complaint as premature. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Back in August, when Mattel won $100 million in damages from the federal jury that decided the company's copyright infringement case against MGA Entertainment Inc., the verdict was widely considered--including by us--to be a disappointment for Mattel, which had asked for more than $1 billion after the jury determined that MGA created its widely popular Bratz dolls based on designs by a Mattel employee. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Mattel claims that it is not responsible for $140 million of MGA's attorneys fees sought by insurer Evanston Insurance Co., arguing that this type of subrogation has already been rejected in another case, reports Law360. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance) Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Discussion of Catherine Tremblay’s article on cost approach: (IP finance), US Congress cites free expression as reason ICANN must remain controlled by US government: (IP Justice), A new organisation around IP in your company? [read post]
