Search for: "MITSUI & CO LTD" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 1:21 pm by Sutherland LNG
Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. have signed a contract for Tokyo Gas to purchase from Mitsui 520,000 tons of LNG per year over 20 years from the Cameron LNG terminal at a price linked to the Henry Hub gas price. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:14 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
The Supreme Court heard the case of Mitsui & Co Ltd & Ors v Beteiligungsgesellschaft LPG Tankerflotte MBH & Co KG & Anor [2017] UKSC 68 in which it considered whether the expenses occurred by a vessel during a negotiating period with pirates are allowable under Rule F, which covers additional expenses, of the York-Antwerp Rules 1974. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:11 pm by Eversheds Sutherland
Sempra Energy announced that it has entered into a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with Mitsui & Co., LTD. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm by Patent Docs
.; Mitsui Sugar Co. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:00 pm by Eversheds Sutherland
., Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. for the full export capacity of Phase 1 of the proposed Energia Costa Azul (ECA) liquefaction and LNG export project located in Baja California, Mexico. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 1:10 pm by Eversheds Sutherland
The terminal is jointly owned by Sempra LNG, LLC, Total, Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and Japan LNG Investment, LLC. [read post]
31 May 2019, 1:10 pm by Eversheds Sutherland
Cameron LNG is jointly owned by affiliates of Sempra LNG, Total, Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and Japan LNG Investment, LLC, a company jointly owned by Mitsubishi Corporation and Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:31 am
Transocean Ltd. said Friday that insurers of its sunken Deepwater Horizon drilling rig have asked a federal judge to decide if BP Plc and other owners of the Macondo well are entitled to any insurance coverage for the April 20, 2010 disaster.Transocean said it, and its underwriters, believe that BP and minority well owners Anadarko Petroleum Co. and Mitsui & Co. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:21 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The Act changes the mode of recovery to the extent that it makes express provision for the liability of the compensating authority not to be co-extensive with that of the trespassers, but does not reflect any intention of Parliament to change the law to deprive claimants of the right to compensation for consequential losses. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:47 am by Alex Brandt and Ron Clark
On 25 October 2017, the English Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mitsui & Co Ltd and Others v Beteiligungsgesellschaft LPG Tankerflotte MBH & Co KG and Another (The “Longchamp”). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 708 This case considered, where a ship is hijacked by pirates, and the initial ransom sum demanded is not paid, but a period of negotiation is entered into resulting in a lower ransom sum being agreed and paid, whether the expenses incurred during the negotiation period can be deemed to be general average expenses under the York-Antwerp Rules, Rule F (and therefore borne by all parties rather than by the owners alone), on the basis that they are expenses incurred as… [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:10 am by William Holder
  Factual background During the London riots of August 2011, a gang of youths broke into a Sony distribution warehouse in North London. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 682 The issue before the Supreme Court was the quantification of riot compensation claims, including a question of statutory construction: whether persons who suffer loss when rioters destroy their property can in principle obtain compensation for consequential losses, including loss of profits and loss of rent, under Riot (Damages) Act 1886, s 2. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
The latter have minor significance here given the poor drafting and the Mitsui principle of construction [".. the poorer the quality of the drafting, the less willing the court should be to be driven by semantic niceties to attribute to the parties an improbable and unbusinesslike intention, if the language used, whatever it may lack in precision, is reasonably capable of an interpretation which attributes to the parties an intention to make provision for contingencies inherent in the… [read post]