Search for: "MURDOCK & COMPANY" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 2:41 pm
In e-mails with the company, Murdock asserted that a signature, which related to the cover artwork and was purportedly his, was fraudulent. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Based on Laster’s findings, the company could well argue that Murdock and Carter were acting for their own interests and not in the interests of the company. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:51 am by CorporateAcquisitions MergerLawBlogger
" You'll remember that Chairman and CEO of Dole David Murdock is taking the company private using a structure that includes all of the procedural... [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 3:28 am by Karel Frielink
On the second day of trial, Murdock tried a different approach: He became evasive and attempted to cast himself as an uninvolved CEO who lacked any meaningful knowledge about what was going on at his company. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
(Incidentally, in this particular storyline, Murdock is disbarred after The Kingpin, a nefarious super villain, learns his identity and uses allegations of professional misconduct against Murdock. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:09 pm by Amanda Proctor
Murdock, analyzing whether fraud claims against insureds were covered under an excess D&O policy issued by RSUI Indemnity Co. to Dole Food Company Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by William A. Schreiner, Jr.
  According to Murdock’s lawyer, Rutgers did not renew Murdock’s contract as director of player personnel after he reported Rice’s behavior to the school last summer. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 8:53 am by Samir B. Dahman
” says William Murdock, Executive Director of the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm by Legal Reader
In Weeks, the Court held, over Justice Glenn Murdock's 46-page dissent, that "[u]nder Alabama law, a brand-name drug company may be held liable for fraud or misrepresentation...by a plaintiff claiming physical injury caused by a generic drug manufactured by a different company." [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm by Legal Reader
In Weeks, the Court held, over Justice Glenn Murdock's 46-page dissent, that "[u]nder Alabama law, a brand-name drug company may be held liable for fraud or misrepresentation...by a plaintiff claiming physical injury caused by a generic drug manufactured by a different company." [read post]