Search for: "MV Contract Transportation, Inc." Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Late last year, in MV Transportation, 368 NLRB No. 66 (2019), the NLRB addressed this issue and held that an employer’s unilateral change did not violate the Act “[w]here [a] contract[‘s] language [arguably] covers the act in question,” thus contractually authorizing the employer to make the complained-of unilateral change. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Andrew Ramonas
The coalition includes Coach America, Veolia Transportation Inc., First Transit Inc. and MV Transportation Inc., according to Kevin O’Neill, Patton's public policy department deputy chairman. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
” This reasoning was sound and, in the view of the appeals court, the Board had “brought up to date the commercial reality ignored by the MV Transportation majority. [read post]
  Advice concluded that under MV Transportation, which adopted the “contract coverage” standard, the employer was privileged to request one-hour notice, and that the Board would not choose between “two ‘equally plausible’ interpretations of a contract. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:18 am by @ErikJHeels
(Charleston, MA) Blue Line Transport, Inc. [read post]
  The Board analyzed this under the “contract-coverage” doctrine set forth in MV Transportation, 368 NLRB No. 66 (2019). [read post]