Search for: "Maersk Line, Ltd."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
On January 3, the Department of Justice announced that Maersk Line Limited had agreed to pay nearly $32 million to resolve allegations that the company overbilled the government for shipping goods and equipment to Iraq and Afghanistan. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:54 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Virginia-based container shipper, Maersk Line Ltd., and its Denmark-based affiliate, Maersk Line, entered into a settlement agreement in which Maersk will pay the federal government nearly $32 million to resolve allegations that the companies submitted false claims involving cargo shipments to U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm
The crew members sued Maersk Line Ltd., the operator of the vessel, and Waterman Steamship Corp., the crewing company which hired them. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:00 pm
" Cronan and several other crewmen have filed suit in Texas against Maersk Line Ltd. and Waterman Steamship Corp., alleging the companies were negligent in sending the ship into known pirate territory with inadequate protection. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Sharafi &… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Maersk Line, Ltd., — F.3d —- (2d Cir. 2013). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:06 am
Moller – Maersk AS (t/a Maersk Line) [2010] EWHC 3224 (Comm) (09 December 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 4:55 pm
GSE Lining Tech., Inc., 383 F.3d 1303, 1311 (Fed. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
Maersk, Inc., 159 F. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm
Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., although those cases appear to have used flawed methodologies. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Maersk (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court S D Texas: Continuing use of accused products sold prior to notice of patent is not direct infringement sufficient to support claim of indirect infringement: Tesco v Weatherford (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Enhanced damages & attorney’s fees: Plaintiff awarded $5 million in fees, $3 million in expert expenses, and treble damages as a result of litigation misconduct by defendant: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Maddux claimed Maersk Line, Limited Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. are vicariously liable for his injuries pursuant to the Jones Act, the Public Vessels Act, the Suits in Admiralty Act and the general maritime law of the United States, or alternatively Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Moreover, the typically de minimus ransomware payment demands (on average, about $679) are more akin to a financial nuisance than a material fiscal line-item, so from a cost-benefit perspective, payment can make the most sense. [read post]
