Search for: "Main v. Vermont Supreme Court" Results 1 - 20 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 4:23 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
Supreme Court Strikes Down Vermont Prescriber Data Privacy Law . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:37 am by admin
Supreme Court June 23 declared unconstitutional a Vermont statute that bars pharmacies from selling or disclosing information that identifies physicians and the medications they prescribe for marketing purposes and precludes pharmaceutical manufacturers from using such information to market their products (Sorrell v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
The Supreme Court reversed fewer than 50 percent of the cases from only three states — Maine, Vermont and Puerto Rico (treated as a state for the purpose of this analysis). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether the First Amendment prohibits the enforcement of a Vermont law that restricts access to information in prescription drug records.At issue is a decision of the U.S. [read post]
Abortion policy is now in the hands of the states following the US Supreme Court’s Friday decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 10:48 am by Orin France
The DOJ is basing its claim on the US Supreme Court decision in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:22 am by John McFarland
Mistakes that might matter little if made by the Supreme Court of Vermont may have more far-reaching effects if made by the Supreme Court of Texas. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The Colorado Supreme Court was wrong on the law, but the case raises the same institutional challenges as Bush v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
The other states, being unhappy about Maine (or Texas, Vermont, South Carolina, etc.) shirking its obligations, sue the departing state for its share.And they bring that suit in the Supreme Court since the court has original jurisdiction to hear matters "between two or more states. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Because the Supreme Court in fact ruled against aggregate limits, Vermont’s aggregate limit will not go into effect. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm by William McGeveran
This morning the Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision (PDF here) in a strange case that many privacy scholars had watched closely, Sorell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:11 am
  In California some 18,000 couples marry between June 16, 2008 and November 4, 2008, when the window closed on same-sex marriage according to our Supreme Court's ruling in Straus v. [read post]