Search for: "Mark B Rogers" Results 1 - 20 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 8:43 am
After a long-term illness, Mark Rogers passed away in July of last year. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
, raising objections under Article 7(1)(b) on the basis that the marks lacked distinctive character. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Explicit misleadingness: Dickinson alleged that the “docuseries” advertising misled as to content because the show was scripted, but that wasn’t enough under Rogers because Rogers requires the use of the mark to be explicitly misleading. [read post]
9 May 2010, 4:37 am by David Vasella
Das BVerwGer bestätigt einen Entscheid des IGE, das einen Widersprich von Roger & Gallet gegen die Eintragung der Marke"Johann Maria Farina zur Madonna Köln Royal Echt Kölnischwasser (fig.). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  ALJ Rogers agreed and adopted OUII’s proposed construction that “printhead” means “the element of a printer that applies the mark or image to the print media. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:31 am
  Roberts confirms the Rogers shaping (as does Mark Evans in a posting that refers to it as bandwidth management, a distinction without a difference in my view) but then takes me to task for wrapping it into the net neutrality debate. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
As applied by the courts over a thirty year period, use of the Rogers test almost always resulted in dismissal of the infringement claim, often on a pre-trial Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal or on summary judgment. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
The first prong of the Rogers test requires a showing that the use of a mark has artistic relevance to the underlying work. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:06 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Here are Anne Kornblut and Krissah Thompson in WaPo: [B]eing [a Washington] outsider ... helped undo Rogers, whose runway outfits and magazine shoots -- and an I-make-my-own-rules attitude -- drew criticism from political circles and within corners of the administration. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Camilla Hrdy
Some stuff that was just incomprehensible to me, like Section 33(b)(6), I now know why that was there, and I now know why other things are not there, like the fact that there is no definition in the statute of likelihood of confusion; or how one comes to own a mark; or secondary meaning... [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Focusing on defining marks is important b/c multifactor infringement test often zooms back & forth b/t what the mark is in analyzing the different factors. [read post]