Search for: "Mark D Peters"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm
Marks: Peter absolutely characterized it best. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
[Section 2(d) opposition to registration of DUBOIS for "distilled spirits," in view of the registered mark CLOS DU BOIS for wine]. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 3:49 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Franzese, Seton Hall Law School, Eugene D. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
In re Krete LLC, Serial No. 90369855 (June 24, 2002) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm
Mark D. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 3:24 am
A certain TTAB Judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time by just looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018 (TTAB 2011). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Cataldo) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below left, for "wine," in view of the registered mark show below right, for "vodka. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
" Speymalt Whiskey Distributors Ltd, Serial No. 79296030 (March 16, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 3:43 am
Cataldo) [Section 2(d) refusal of NEXGEN for golf clubs and golf accessories, in view of the registered mark THE NEXT GENERATION IN GOLF MATS! [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
Cataldo) [Section 2(d) refusal of BABYMONSTERS, in stylized form, for toy animals, stuffed toys, and other toys, in view of the registered mark BABY MONSTERS, in standard form, for baby furniture.] [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of KABOOM! [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
I'd have to see their pictures.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:03 am
A TTAB judge once told me that you can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by just looking at the goods/services and the marks. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:14 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark PACIFIC VIEW VINEYARDS for wine [VINEYARDS disclaimed], in view of the registered mark PACIFIC VISTA for wine].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:34 am
About ten years ago, a TTAB judge said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:46 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
