Search for: "Mark Dunlap v. United State" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm by Marina Chafa
  Two of Dunlap’s big cases, in which he presented to the Supreme Court, included a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am by Marina Chafa
Dureska Senior Counsel at Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig’s Atlanta office   Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig (DBL) scored another victory at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) for the trademark “INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE CARE SYSTEMS” for, in pertinent part, chiropractic services. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:05 am by Holly Brezee
Dureska [3/4/22] Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States denied review in Savannah College of Art and Design v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:18 am by Holly Brezee
By: Geoffrey Dureska  [6/17/22] THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DENIES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN CASE CONCERNING TIME TRAVELING, KNIFE-WEILDING, WESTERN ATTIRED HEROES WITH KNIGHTLY HERITAGE In late 2021, The Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit… [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am by Holly Brezee
The pending appeal before the Supreme court of the United States is styled Susan K. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
The jury found Australian Leather and its owner Eddie Oygur willfully infringed the “UGG” mark when the Australian company sold 12 pairs of sheepskin boots brandishing the mark to customers in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Holly Brezee
After Beasley’s failed petitions to cancel Howard’s USPT, Beasley filed a suit in the United States District Court of New Jersey under the Lanham Act, alleging an infringement claim against Howard. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:59 am by Holly
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456, 1460 (Fed. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:16 am by Holly Brezee
Under the Trademark Act, a famous mark is one that is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of goods and services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:42 pm by Lydia Estep
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm by Olivia Cross
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Arctic Cat”) appeals from a judgmentof the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover precomplaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Holly Brezee
Federal marks are marks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm by dbllawyers
Lehman Brothers’ failure resulted in the largest bankruptcy filing in United States history. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm by Holly Brezee
The attorneys at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig have decades of experience at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am by Holly
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued its recent scrutiny of the practices of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in a non-precedential opinion issued November 22, 2023, regarding American Marriage Ministries’ challenge to the Universal Life Church’s “GET ORDAINED” trademark application based upon the alleged lack of distinctiveness and possibly failure to function as a mark for both classes of recited services. [read post]