Search for: "Marriage of Marsden (1982)"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 11:11 am
While it sounds like the name of a person, Moore Marsden is actually named after two Supreme Court cases from the early 1980s: In the re Marriage of Moore and Marriage of Marsden, an appellate case from 1982. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:49 pm
If salaries, bonuses, commissions, etc. earned by a spouse during marriage are used to reduce the mortgage principal or increase the equity in a spouse’s separate property house, the community acquires an ownership interest in the home The formula for calculating the community property interest in the separate property house at the time of trial (or settlement conference) is in the California Court of Appeals opinion for Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 CA3d… [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:49 pm
The Moore-Marsden formula is derived from the holdings in two California Appellate cases: Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 CA3d 426 and Marriage of Moore (1980) 28 C3d 366, which provide, unless a couple has a valid pre or postnuptial agreement stating otherwise: If community property is used to reduce the mortgage principal or increase the equity in a spouse’s separate property house, the community acquires an ownership interest in the… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
Rptr. 662, 618 P.2d 208], as modified in In re Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 Cal. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:36 pm
See Marriage of Moore (1980) 28 C3d 366, 371/ Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 CA3d 426, 439. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:01 pm
Those two merged in 1982 as the Western States Meat Association. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
The approach, further clarified in the Marriage of Marsden 130 Cal. [read post]
