Search for: "McDonald v. Employment Security Department"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2020, 6:43 am
Restaurant workers in Salazar v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
The Court held in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
It has, however, ruled that McDonald’s should not be held responsible for any labor violations of the franchisers (i.e. it is not a joint employer). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices,… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices,… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices,… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices,… [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm
Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 7:32 pm
It will also be important to secure witness information, documents, and the like, given that the employer may face litigation over stale issues down the road.The opinion is McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit ruled for the police department, reasoning that Muldrow’s transfer had not resulted in a significant employment disadvantage for her. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Odin, VP and Trademark Counsel of The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.Anca Cornis-Pop, Senior Counsel, Global Marketing, AvonLicensing considerations; launching a cosmetic; FDA and FTC regulations; ingredients labeling.2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.Fashion Industry Employment Law Issues Tracy Agyemang, Attorney, Department of Labor (and Model) Employment Law PanelElisa Bloom, ProskauerThe legal structure of modeling agencies as business entities, modeling agency contracts,… [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
In Su v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
McDonalds Restaurants In the Liebeck v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:03 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Wearables in the office: Security risk? [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:12 am
” For example, did the McDonald case [McDonald v City of Freeport [TX], 834 FSupp 921] concern the issue of “free speech,” or “whistle blowing” or, perhaps, both. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Department of Homeland Security and U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea , heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
