Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
However, in 2003, the state legislature introduced the section 1102.6 standard in reaction to several high-profile corporate scandals and coverups. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 9:32 am
The defendants are McDonnell Douglas Co (based in Chicago), SAS Group, Boeing, Leach International, Korean Air, Rohr, Hawker Siddley, Esterline Technologies, Alenia Aeronautica, and Pratt & Whitney. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:00 am
Jim Worsham, a longtime aviation expert and former president of the McDonnell Douglas Corporation was critically injured in a San Bernardino car accident. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
However, as to but-for causation in McDonnell Douglas “pretext” cases, the Court was silent. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:55 am by Susan Wooleyhan Caine
” She also established the John McDonnell Scholarship in the School of Engineering & Applied Science in honor of her father, the retired chairman of the board of McDonnell Douglas Corporation and a life trustee of Washington University. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Accordingly, the complaining party must come forward with “direct evidence” of racial discrimination or satisfy the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting scheme. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Or is the corporation merely property, a complex commodity? [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
McDonnell Douglas’ Fatal Third Level PPG asked the court to dismiss Lawson’s claim without trial under the McDonnell Douglas test. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 626, 667-668.) [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It occurred to me recently that it's been a few years since the Court of Appeals in a published opinion reversed summary judgment in a straight McDonnell-Douglas case, which allows the plaintiff to win on the strength of circumstantial evidence. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Melanie Osborne
 The court also found that Conitz failed to show the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:18 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
For straight McDonnell-Douglas discrimination claims we live in a pretext-plus world in the Second Circuit, but the majority reiterates that "A plaintiff may prove that retaliation was a but-for cause of an adverse employment action by demonstrating weaknesses, implausibilities, inconsistencies, or contradictions in the employer’s proffered legitimate, non retaliatory reasons for its action. [read post]