Search for: "Menasha Utilities"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2009, 10:00 pm
In a decision issued on December 1, 2009 involving the City of Menasha, the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission ("WERC") held that a proposal by the City to "maintain language from the 2007–2008 Agreement which required that the appeal procedures contained in Section 62.13, Stats. be utilized by a union-represented employee who wished to challenge discipline imposed pursuant to that statutory provision" constituted a prohibited subject of bargaining… [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 10:00 pm
In a decision issued on December 1, 2009 involving the City of Menasha, the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission ("WERC") held that a proposal by the City to "maintain language from the 2007–2008 Agreement which required that the appeal procedures contained in Section 62.13, Stats. be utilized by a union-represented employee who wished to challenge discipline imposed pursuant to that statutory provision" constituted a prohibited subject of bargaining… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:28 am
Menasha v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Although a counterclaim of invalidity had been lodged, the question of invalidity was not reached, even though there were significant questions of indefiniteness and functional claiming.For example claim 1 of the '727 patent had a "wherein" clause, which amounted to claiming a result, without utilizing means for language:1. [read post]
