Search for: "Merck Sharp & Dohme" Results 1 - 20 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 6:34 pm
Electron Microscope Image of Human BloodPhotographers: Bruce Wetzel and Harry SchaeferJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Wyeth LLC [2020] EWHC 2636 (Pat) (15 Oct 2020) This was an action by Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd ("MSD") for the revocation of European Patent (UK) 2,676,679 for formulations which stabilize and inhibit precipitation of immunogenic compositions [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:54 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Last week, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:24 am by fraudfighters
  Merck Sharp & Dohme, one of the country’s largest pharmaceutical companies, has agreed to pay $950 million to settle both civil fraud allegations and criminal charges relating to the promotion of the painkiller Vioxx. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:49 pm by Patent Docs
(and Judge Pauline Newman continues to disagree with her brethren in some regards) in a decision handed down last Friday, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
The Four Courts, Dublin Author Jtdirl Released into public domain by the copyright owner Source Wikipedia Supreme Court of Ireland Jane Lambert Irish Supreme Court (Chief Justice Clarke and Justices O'Donnel Donal, McKechnie, Dunne, O'Malley and Iseult) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:56 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Today, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:58 pm by Patent Docs
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., decided earlier this month, and as a bonus, illustrated how including disclosure in a specification for completeness and expanded claim scope can result in an invalidated claim when that scope unnecessarily encompasses the prior art. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 10:33 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
American pharmaceutical company Merck, Sharp & Dohme (Merck) will pay $950 million to resolve criminal charges and civil claims related to its promotion and marketing of the painkiller Vioxx® (rofecoxib). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by Steve Brachmann
(NYSE: MRK), which is headquartered in Whitehouse Station, NJ, and also does business under the name Merck Sharp & Dohme MSD, is one of the world’s largest and most renowned pharmaceutical development companies. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:29 pm by eithurburn@getnicklaw.com
Merck Sharp & Dohme, a unit of Merck & Co., pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of misbranding its painkiller drug Vioxx. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:08 am by Mark Summerfield
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Apotex Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 928 (31 August 2012) Interlocutory injunctions – prima facie case – balance of convenience – permanent impact of generic competition upon market for pharmaceutical products The Federal Court of Australia (Justice Jagot) has issued a preliminary injunction barring generic pharmaceutical manufacturer from marketing and selling nasal sprays containing the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) for… [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:51 am by Tim Zubizarreta
Merck, Sharp & Dohme manufactures the drug Fosamax to treat and prevent osteoporosis in older women. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by Steve Brachmann
(NYSE: MRK), which is headquartered in Whitehouse Station, NJ, and also does business under the name Merck Sharp & Dohme MSD, is one of the world’s largest and most renowned pharmaceutical development companies. [read post]