Search for: "Michael J. Peacock" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 3:17 pm by Brian Leiter
Michael Dunn (Indiana, emeritus); Don Garrett (NYU); Grigori Mints (Stanford); Christopher Peacocke (Columbia); and Scott Soames (Southern California). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:33 pm by Charon QC
Solicitor and journalist  David Allen Green  has an interesting piece on the recent fisting Obscenity trial: Obscenity victory The jury at Southwark Crown Court has returned unanimous Not Guilty verdicts on each of the six charges under the Obscene Publications Act 1959 against Michael Peacock. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:43 am
Peacock Misfortunes Elphin vi. 93 Our agrestic kakistocracy now castigates the heinous sins which were then committed with impunity ["Agrestic" = rural, rough and uncouth.]1876 J. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:47 pm by Fredrick Vars
Candace Gorman Hal Abramson Heather Elliott Heather Herrington Henry McGee Herbert Larson Ian Weinstein Ileana Gutierrez J. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by Karen Tani
This week, Michael O'Donnell reviews it, here, for the Nation.Also in the Nation, Richard J. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Twitter was alive with talk of an obscenity case at Southwark Crown Court last week: Michael Peacock was found not guilty of six charges under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Walker Brock, Hirschfeld PropertiesDarren Lis, Reznick GroupEllen Cheng, Lilocorp Inc.Gary Pomerantz, WSP Flack + KurtzRobert Sedlak, WSP Flack + KurtzBen Kursman, Herrick, Feinstein LLPSherman Boxer, Sherman Advertising AssociatesJeremiah Collins, CNYHeather Dolland, Roux Associates Inc.Michael Roux, Roux Associates Inc.Stuart Rich, Meister Seelig & FeinCharles Tallinger, Partner Matthew Cosentino, TerraCRGKate Grossman, Greenwich Energy SolutionsBarani Tansy, Greenwich Energy SolutionsSteve… [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
We deny the Government’s jurisdictional challenge because we find that at least one of the named Petitioners, Michael Krawitz, has standing to challenge the agency’s action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
We deny the Government’s jurisdictional challenge because we find that at least one of the named Petitioners, Michael Krawitz, has standing to challenge the agency’s action. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
Marshall does not supply rule of decision in present proceeding -- Bankruptcy Court may hear FCCPA action, but it cannot enter final judgment without parties' consent, as FCCPA action is non-core proceeding -- Discussion of effect of defendant's admission of jurisdiction -- Even if court were to relieve defendant of its consent to jurisdiction and treat proceeding as non-core proceeding without both parties' consent, court would still hear proceeding -- Exercise of permissive… [read post]