Search for: "Michael W. Cassell" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 12:21 am
  Later in that same interview, she said that “[w]hen [Brown] turned around he had about one foot on the grass and one on the driveway. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:16 am
Senator Kyl directly stated his view that “[w]hen Congress enacted the CVRA, it intended to protect crime victims throughout the criminal justice process – from the investigative phases to the final conclusion of a case. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:15 am
[W]ith the officer’s left arm, he’s out the window grabbing Big Mike’s right arm (101:22). [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:00 pm
Cassell lost, but a year later, President George W. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Will Baude
I would like to thank the professors who have been my mentors along the way—Lisa Bernstein, Elizabeth Emens, Richard Epstein, Philip Hamburger, Bernard Harcourt, Andrew Kull, Geoff Stone, Cass Sunstein, Steven Yeazell, and especially that wonderful judge and scholar, Michael W. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:53 am by Guest Blogger
”) and one of legal capacity (“[W]ill the law allow AIs to serve[?] [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Cassels, Brock & Blackwell LLP (IPblog)   China Chinese TM system crash course (Class 46) As WTO reviews China, EU, US criticise its policy on innovation, IP rights (IP Watch) US, China weaving closer trade and IP cooperation; Focus on innovation (IP Watch) Hubei chemical firm sues over trademark loss (China IP Magazine)   Estonia Estonian license draft open for public discussion (Creative Commons)   Europe EP legal service issues opinion on release of ACTA docs to EP… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm by Elim
& Shaw, Byron 2013 Link Constitutional Law, Third Edition Monahan, Patrick J. 2006 Link Copyright Law Vaver, David 2000 Link Counsel for the Defence: The Bernard Cohn Memorial Lectures in Criminal Law Greenspan, Edward L. 2005 Link Courts, Litigants and the Digital Age : Law, Ethics and Practice Eltis, Karen 2012 Link Criminal Law, Fifth Edition Roach, Kent 2012 Link Criminal Law, Fourth Edition Roach, Kent 2009 Link Criminal Procedure, Second Edition Coughlan, Steve 2012 Link Criminal Procedure… [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Moritz, decided Mar. 31 by the Nebraska Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice John Freudenberg, joined by Chief Justice Michael Heavican and Justices Stephanie Stacy and Jonathan Papik): At issue in this appeal is whether social media posts directed toward local public figures from a public account of an officer of a local bank constituted misconduct in connection with work disqualifying the employee from unemployment benefits. [read post]