Search for: "Mike Framer"
Results 1 - 20
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 6:26 pm
Mike Dorf has an interesting post exploring whether and why monuments to slave-owning framers like Washington are more morally acceptable than monuments celebrating Robert E. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
This week and next at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on Michael Klarman's new book, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution (Oxford University Press 2016).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Jud Campbell (Richmond), James Fox (Stetson), Mark Graber (Maryland), Steve Griffin (Tulane), Calvin Johnson (Texas), Sanford Levinson (Texas), Laura Kalman (UC Santa Barbara), Bernadette Meyler (Stanford), Christina Mulligan… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
" You go, Mike! [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm
I'm not sure what the Framers would say. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Michael KlarmanFor the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
In that post, I explain the problems with all of the usual names: Framers, Ratifiers, Founders. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
Mike’s bright idea has resulted in a successful Supreme Court blog, First One @ One First. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In addition, a Speaker named Mike is long overdue. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
Mike O'Shea. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:56 am
The Framers of the Constitution abhorred the British practice of issuing general warrants, which empowered the government to search entire homes and businesses. [read post]
12 May 2007, 12:01 am
In many ways, it actually resembles the 18th century British system, which the Framers copied and which was developing into a parliamentary system, but was not there yet. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:04 am
The Framers of the Constitution may have expected a constitutional provision to address a matter in a certain way. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 12:02 am
The piece defended Justice Breyer's comments on the Heller case that criticized the Heller majority and argued that the original intent of the Framers did not favor a right to bear arms for self defense. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm
[Speaker Mike Johnson was both right and wrong] Last month, House Speaker Mike Johnson caused a stir by stating in an interview that "the separation of church and state is a misnomer. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 11:55 am
Mike Lee, Prof. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 am
Mike O'Shea has thoughts on tomorrow's argument in D.C. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:59 pm
By Mike Dorf The June 2012 issue of the Harvard Law Review includes a review I wrote of two books: Jack Balkin's Living Originalism and David Strauss's The Living Constitution. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:46 am
Chafetz also explains, commonsensically enough, that the framers saw assassination as a procedurally defective mechanism. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
On the whole, the framers and ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not expect it to forbid de jure racial segregation in public schools. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
In a more serious vein, over at the Originalism Blog, Professor Mike Rappaport arguesthat the Freedman’s Bureau Act does not support the constitutionality of modern race-conscious affirmative action programs. [read post]
