Search for: "Mike Barnett Construction"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
Mike Rappaport blogs today on the marvelous conference that he and Mike Ramsey organized at the University of San Diego. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:48 am
The general construction of a lawsuit of any nature goes like this: A problem arises. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
I agree with this understanding of the scope of construction–and as far as I could tell, so did Barnett, Balkin, and Whittington. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 4:58 am
If the originalist still gamely argues that the original understanding is compatible with modern understandings, that casts doubt on the claim that originalism is really driving interpretation (as opposed to construction).Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
The latest post from Mike Rappaport responds to Randy Barnett (here and here) responding to an earlier post by Mike. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
Mike Dorf has an interesting post about why right-wing "Dworkinianism" has never developed on the right. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:42 am
They constructed their theories in the context of that world. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:10 pm
I am now beginning to read John McGinnis and Mike Rappaport’s book Originalism and the Good Constitution for my Georgetown seminar, “Recent Books on the Constitution. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:58 am
Mike Ramsey and I put the conference together, and let me tell you, running it required an enormous amount of work. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
(On September 16 at 6:00 p.m., the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute will be hosting an event about the strategy in NFIB, followed by a book signing for Unprecedented, featuring an All-Star cast: Randy Barnett, Mike Carvin, Greg Katsas, Alan Morrison, Erin Murphy, and Paul Smith. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:00 pm
Day 2, Part 2 (1:56:18 – in response to Senator Mike Lee re: textualism vs. originalism): Judging is paying attention to the text of the statute, informed by those canons of construction such as presumption against extraterroriality, presumption of mens rea, presumption against implied repeals […] Originalism, as I see it, means, in essence constitutional textualism, meaning the original public meaning of the constitutional text. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Day 2, Part 2 (1:56:18 – in response to Senator Mike Lee re: textualism vs. originalism): Judging is paying attention to the text of the statute, informed by those canons of construction such as presumption against extraterroriality, presumption of mens rea, presumption against implied repeals […] Originalism, as I see it, means, in essence constitutional textualism, meaning the original public meaning of the constitutional text. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
In fact, Mike, John and I all employ values to choose our particular versions of originalism. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:50 am
If one is a New Originalist, for example, one makes many different kinds of arguments in the zone of constitutional construction. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:50 am
If one is a New Originalist, for example, one makes many different kinds of arguments in the zone of constitutional construction. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
Barnett of White & Steele, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Denver, Colorado. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
Barnett of White & Steele, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Denver, Colorado. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
In a legal settlement reached Tuesday, the state Department of Transportation agreed that whenever it builds new highways, it will also spend a little bit of money to retrofit old ones – thousands of miles of which were constructed without sediment ponds or other pollution controls. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
L.J. 465, 467 (2023) (arguing that the MQD transformed from a tool of “construction” to a tool of “interpretation”); Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Va. [read post]
