Search for: "Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 6:45 am
In order to protect some industries, the House bill exempts any “iron mining extraction and processing facility” or “paper mill, wood products manufacturer, sawmill, or oriented strand board manufacturer” that would otherwise be subject to potential rate increases stemming from the standard. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 27 W.C.D. 379, 218 N.W.2d 458 (1974), the Court explained that:"[W]hen the usual tasks ordinary to an employee’s work substantially aggravate, accelerate, or combine with a pre-existing disease or latent condition to produce a disability, the entire disability is compensable, no apportionment being made on the basis of relative causal contribution of the pre-existing condition and the work activities. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 11:28 pm
They are:to replace the current test of innovative step with a ‘higher’ standard based on the High Court’s decision in the ‘3M case’ (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd [1980] HCA 9; to require that innovation patent owners request examination/certification before the third anniversary of lodgement of their innovation patent; and to exclude from protection by an innovation patent all… [read post]
17 May 2015, 6:28 am
The law of obviousness under the Patents Act 1952 was originally messed up by the High Court in the ‘3M Case’ (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd [1980] HCA 9). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Metalcasters of Minnesota Geokon Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:32 am
(Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing) Plant Showing an Employee Working on one of the Products. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 126 F. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 8:07 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.,284 F.3d 901 (8th Cir. 2002), the Court ruled that the plaintiff could not bring the claims discussed above under Section 1132(a)(2). [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:31 am
& Erection Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Part of that legislation is an emphasis on boosting U.S. manufacturing. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:32 pm
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 226 Cal. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Simplicity Manufacturing, 563 F.3d 38, 57 (3d Cir. 2009). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., No. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 226 Cal. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:19 pm
In 1984, Jenson mailed a complaint to the Minnesota Department of Human Rights complaining about severe sexual harassment she had been experiencing for years while working at a male-dominated Eveleth Taconite Co. mine. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:01 pm
She is the author of Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (2002) Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety (2003), What to Eat (2006), Pet Food Politics: The Chihuahua in the Coal Mine (2008), and co-authored with Malden Nesheim, Feed Your Pet Right (2010) and Why Calories Count: From Science to Politics (2012). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Bartlett, The Reserve Mining Controversy (1980). [4] Reserve Mining Co v. [read post]
