Search for: "Mitchell v. US Secret Service" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2013, 11:27 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012 The broadened definition of trade secrets as defined by the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012 (“TTSCA”) makes clear that trade secrets protected by the EEA may be those merely “related to” a product or service used in or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce, even if the trade secret itself is not used directly in… [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
Mitchell and Jessen were then subpoenaed, but the U.S. moved to quash the subpoenas, invoking the state secrets privilege. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
Sandeen, Mitchell Hamline School of Law   The Defend Trade Secrets Act (S. 1890) passed out of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See § 1836(b) ("An owner of a trade secret that is misappropriated may bring a civil action under this subsection if the trade secret is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See § 1836(b) ("An owner of a trade secret that is misappropriated may bring a civil action under this subsection if the trade secret is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am by Robert Loeb, David Ryan
Plaintiffs allege that as the interrogation program expanded through the mid-2000s, Mitchell and Jessen formed a company to meet the CIA’s growing demand for their services, ultimately hiring several dozen employees and billing the government for $81 million. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:06 am by Beth Graham
Which is why we’ve incorporated ideas from non-federal negotiators to limit mandatory arbitration agreements,” said Under Secretary Ted Mitchell. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
The Dangers of Online Dating It’s no secret that there are many negative and downright-scary tales about people getting together through services like OKCupid or Match. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 3:27 am by Alex Potcovaru
Ashley Deeks previewed her forthcoming article on the use of secret commitments between states in contemporary practice, noting that a majority of those now-revealed commitments have complied with the U.N. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
 Driver v Crown Prosecution Service, heard on 8 December 2021 (Julian Knowles J)  ZXC v Bloomberg LP, heard on 30 November – 1 December 2021 (UK Supreme Court). [read post]