Search for: "Morillion v. Royal Packing Co. (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Augustus v. ABM Security: Court of Appeal Addresses On Call Rest Periods
21 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Royal Packing Co. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
LMRA Does Not Preempt California Wage and Hour Laws
27 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 578. [read post]
Wage Law - http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/
Augustus v. ABM Security Services: Cal. Supremes Hold that Labor Code Prohibits On-Duty and On-Call Rest Periods
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 586. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Augustus v. ABM Security Services: Cal. Supremes Hold that Labor Code Prohibits On-Duty and On-Call Rest Periods
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 586. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Sali v. Corona Regional: “Compensable Time” and Considering Inadmissible Evidence at Class Cert.
5 Sep 2018, 6:07 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal.4th 575 (2000)). [read post]
Impact Litigation Journal - http://www.impactlitigation.com/
Northern District Certifies Meal Period Class on Behalf of Tesoro Refinery Plant Operators: Delagarza v. Tesoro Ref. & Mktg. Co.
10 Sep 2011, 8:00 am by Matt C. Bailey
” See Morillion v. [read post]
Bailey Class Action Daily - http://www.baileydaily.com/
Ninth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of State-Law Commute Time Claim in Rutti v. Lojack Corp.
3 Mar 2010, 5:53 pm by Matt C. Bailey
LEXIS 4278, at 40-44 (citing Morillion v. [read post]
Bailey Class Action Daily - http://www.baileydaily.com/
Technology blurs work/life definition
11 Aug 2009, 8:43 am
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575. [read post]
California Labor and Employment Defense Blog - http://www.vtzlawblog.com/
Weekly Tip: "On-Call", "Stand By" and Travel Time
5 Oct 2007, 6:22 pm
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575) [read post]
California Labor and Employment Defense Blog - http://www.vtzlawblog.com/
Augustus v. American Commercial Security Services: Superior Court to Enter Judgment for $90 Million in Rest Period Class Action
11 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, Aguilar v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
In Rutti v. Lojack Corporation, Inc., a divided Ninth Circuit panel examines compensability of pre and post-workday activities
8 Sep 2009, 9:45 pm
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575 (2000). [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
New decision on when employees must be paid for commute time in company vehicles
16 Nov 2018, 6:35 pm by Anthony Zaller
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 582-584. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
Discounted meal policy requiring employees to stay on company premises upheld
22 Mar 2019, 5:06 pm by Anthony Zaller
Royal Packing Co. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
C.D.Cal.: Where Defendant’s Rounding Policy Was Facially Neutral No FLSA Violation
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am by Andrew Frisch
Co., 721 F.Supp.2d 804, 820 (N.D.Ill.2010) (time rounding and log-out policies may violate FLSA if they “cause[ ] plaintiffs to work unpaid overtime”); Austin v. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com
Friday’s Five: When employers may be required to pay employees to “do nothing”
6 Aug 2015, 10:10 pm by Anthony Zaller
As explained in Morillion v. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
Wage Order Series, Part II: Money for Nothing? Hours “Worked” And California’s Wage Orders
13 Aug 2014, 1:36 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575 (2000). [read post]
California Peculiarities Employment Law Blog - http://www.calpeculiarities.com/
California Supreme Court Holds that Employees Must Be Paid for Time Driving Through and To Security Checkpoints
2 Apr 2024, 6:02 am by Shareef Farag, Matthew W. Morris
Relying on the reasoning set forth in Morillion v. [read post]
Employment Law Spotlight - http://www.employmentlawspotlight.com/
Unpacking The Brinker Court’s Construction Of California’s Meal and Rest Break Provisions
12 Apr 2012, 7:09 pm by Matt C. Bailey
(See Morillion v. [read post]
Bailey Class Action Daily - http://www.baileydaily.com/
In Contentious Case, Ninth Circuit Rules Commute Time Not Compensable Under Federal Law
15 Jun 2010, 8:38 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575, 578 (2000). [read post]
Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - http://www.chicagobusinesslitigationlawyerblog.com/
California Apple Store employees must be paid for exit inspections
18 Feb 2020, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Royal Packing Co. [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog