Search for: "Mr Carlile" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2014, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In December 2010, Lord Carlile of Berriew, together with two other members of the House of Lords, asked the Home Secretary for a meeting to discuss lifting the exclusion to enable Mrs Rajavi, a dissident Iranian politician who had been excluded from the UK in 1997, to address meetings in the Palace of Westminster. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Rosalind English
Lord Carlile and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department – read judgment The High Court has upheld an order by the Home Secretary preventing Maryam Rajavi, a prominent Iranian dissident, from speaking in Parliament. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:43 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  I didn’t have a chance to meet Mr. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
 It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
13 May 2018, 1:41 pm by Peter Groves
"Mr Cipriani goes on: "The copyright world has become more and more complicated. [read post]
28 May 2016, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
She held at [62] that: Carlile confirms, if any confirmation were needed, that the Convention rights at issue here are very important, freedom of expression being “one of the essential foundations of a democratic society” (para [13]). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD; the Court ruled by a 4-1 majority that the executive’s decision to bar Mrs Rajavi’s admission into the UK on grounds that it would not be conducive to the public good was rational and Secretary of State had not underrated the appellants’ ECHR, art 10 rights or overstated the risk. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:35 pm by David Ma
” and “WE ARE NOW AUTHORIZED TO PAY $833,337.00 IN CASH TO MR JEAN MARC RICHARD! [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:35 am by Simon Fodden
In the case relating to Mr Davey, after he had been discharged as a juror, the judge told the jury in very sweeping terms that they should not use the internet. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:56 am by Legal Beagle
"But Mr Pinto-Duschinsky shows that the situation is not so hopeless and there are means by which, with sufficient support from other states in the Council of Europe, we can repatriate our law of human rights. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This is a claim by Mr Khalid Ansari against Vilnius University and other defendants concerning serious allegations made about Mr Ansari during his time as an employee of Manchester Metropolitan University. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
According to the New York Herald, there was "not a scintilla of evidence" supporting Scott's concerns.[14] The House Committee agreed and reported that the evidence did not support the existence of any local conspiracy to disrupt the "counting of ballots" or "the inauguration of Mr. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Mr Rusbridger thinks he can determine which stories might harm national security — and which will not. [read post]
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm by Giles Peaker
Meanwhile The defendants (save Mrs Laverty who has not engaged in these proceedings) contend that, for reasons I shall explain, the practice is an unconscionable one because it prevents them from putting a proposal to repay the arrears to the court and prevents the court from exercising, or exercising properly, its discretion to defer possession. [read post]