Search for: "Myers v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Temodar (Temozolomide) – US: District Court Delaware: Temador patent unenforceable due to prosecution laches and inequitable conduct: Cancer Research Tech v Barr Labs (Docket Report) (Patent Baristas) (IP Factor) Mirapex (Pramipexole) – US: CAFC: The metes and bounds of obviousness-type double patenting:… [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 9:28 am
The two big trade mark decisions of the European Court of Justice today have been a little overshadowed by the festivities for World Intellectual Property Day, but the IPKat took just enough time off from his ecstatic celebrations to check the Curia website and see what the ECJ had in store for him.Right: objection to the repackaging of pharma products has led to some grey goods traders taking extreme measures to avoid trade mark infringment litigationCase C-348/04, Boehringer… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Australia: University of Western Australia’s application to appeal FCAFC’s decision in University of Western Australia v Gray fails (IP Whiteboard) Colombia/EU/Peru: Tough IP health provisions in Europe’s Colombia/Peru trade deal (IP Watch) (IP tango) EU: Something more about Swiss type claims: G02/08 (SiNApSE) (SiNApSE) US: Pharmaceutical patent settlements – and what about patients? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Australia: University of Western Australia’s application to appeal FCAFC’s decision in University of Western Australia v Gray fails (IP Whiteboard) Colombia/EU/Peru: Tough IP health provisions in Europe’s Colombia/Peru trade deal (IP Watch) (IP tango) EU: Something more about Swiss type claims: G02/08 (SiNApSE) (SiNApSE) US: Pharmaceutical patent settlements – and what about patients? [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]