Search for: "N. E. v. Seattle School District"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
Seattle School Districts Understanding and KNOWING Elena Kagan's views on race and diversity are critical to evaluating her as a nominee for the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
App. 795, 813 n.50, 10 P.3d 452 (2000) (citing Skinner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm
Seattle Sch. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
District Judge James E. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
Seattle Hous. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 45301 Olympia, WA 98504-5301 Phone: (360) 902-8001 (V/TTY), (800) 422-7930 (Toll Free) TTY: (800) 422-7941 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.dshs.wa.gov Eastern Assistive Technology Resource Center West 606 Sharp Spokane, WA 99201 Phone: (800) 214-8731 (V/TTY); (509) 328-9350 (V/TTY) Fax: (509) 326-2261 E-mail: Spokane@seals.org Web: http://wata.org/wata/eatrc/index.htm Washington Assistive Technology Center Washington Coalition of Citizens with Disabilities… [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 3:17 pm
See District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Privacy and Police Investigations: ZXC v Bloomberg (2021) Cambridge Law Journal, Forthcoming, N. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Gilliam(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court E D Wisconsin: Another cautionary tale of joint website ownership: Third Education Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Mars Hill Graduate School – Confusion over Mars Hill name spurs Seattle School’s name change (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(1709 Blog) (Michael Geist) Netherlands District Court of The Hague rules no infringement: Vacu Products v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
Shell Oil Company (Docket Report) Aston Martin – Another e-mail discovery ruling: Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Judge Ward affirms $482,000,000 damages award, but overturns willfulness finding: Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. [read post]
