Search for: "NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2015, 2:02 pm
On August 13, 2015, union pension fund NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare (“NECA”) and the Police and Fire Retirement Systems of the City of Detroit (“PFRS”), acting on behalf of proposed classes of institutional and individual investors, requested preliminary approval for a $272 million settlement with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:44 am
NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 4:14 pm
” Related Web Resources: NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:05 pm
In light of a recent Second Circuit decision, NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:51 pm
” According to the appellate panel, the reasonable inference from NECA’s allegations was that, because the loans backing the certificates were riskier than defendants represented, the future cash flows to which NECA was entitled under the certificates required a higher discount rate once the offering documents’ falsity was revealed, resulting in a lower present value.NECA-IBEW Health and Welfare Fund v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
The court analyzed the plaintiffs’ standing under NECA‐IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 11:55 am
NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund, Dkt. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:34 am
They argued that they had standing for products they didn’t buy under NECA–IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:57 am
However, in accordance with the Second Circuit’s decision in NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:31 pm
NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
Private equity firms and their sponsored funds are not signatories to a portfolio company’s registration statements or prospectuses. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund12-528Issue: Whether the Second Circuit erred in concluding, in direct conflict with a decision from the First Circuit on the same issue, that a representative plaintiff has standing to ass [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
The court here held that once there was a plaintiff with standing to assert a claim against a defendant because the plaintiff suffered some actual injury as a result of the defendant’s conduct, the analysis shifted to class action doctrine, following NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
