Search for: "NOVELTY, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 7:14 am
Capstone Photography, Inc. et al, 2-13-cv-09573 (CACD October 28, 2014, Order) (Snyder, J.) [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
(See, e.g., Apple Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 3:52 am
Swisa, Inc., et al. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 7:38 am
Swisa, Inc. after the jump. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:50 pm
EMD Serono, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
Elavon, Inc., 2019-1345, 2019-1460 (Fed. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:40 pm
Market Leader, Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:31 pm
Swisa Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 4:20 pm
Swisa, Inc. after the jump. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 10:43 am
Swisa, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:37 am
White, 81 U.S. (14 Wall.) 511, 528 (1871). 2) The point of novelty test - requires that "no matter how similar two items look, ‘the accused device must appropriate the novelty in the patented device which distinguishes it from the prior art.'" Litton Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:32 am
TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA INC., et al., had the opportunity to interpret the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) with respect to how this impacts on the issue of the novelty of an invention. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:27 am
In May 2010, intellectual property counsel for Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc., both of New York, NY, had filed an infringement suit alleging Novelty, Inc. of Greenfield, IN, has infringed numerous COACH trademarks which have been registered with the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 7:57 am
Doctor John’s, Inc. leased a storefront in Cahokia, Illinois, where it planned to open a shop that would specialize in a number of adult novelties. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:49 am
Teleflex Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:55 am
Play-By-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., 208 F.3d 368 (2d Cir. 2000). [read post]
Ind. Decisions - 7th Circuit's case involving "'Pull My Finger Fred,' a farting plush doll," is back
28 Nov 2007, 6:55 am
NOVELTY, INC.. is back. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:39 pm
Point of novelty test is rejected; Infringement of a design patent requires that an ordinary observer, taking into account the prior art, would believe the accused design to be the same as the patented design. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
Novelty, Inc. dba Novelty Distributors, Inc., CV 08-5280 AHM (Central District of California 2008). [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:39 am
Swisa, Inc., et al. and requesting the parties to file briefs that address the following questions:Should "point of novelty" be a test for infringement of design patent? [read post]
