Search for: "NYNEX"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Is that deception protected by NYNEX or not? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
Is that deception protected by NYNEX or not? [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:37 pm
Citing NYNEX Corp v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:56 pm
Trinko, LLP (2004); and NYNEX v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
., it cannot help the Commission in view of its inability to find that Rambus's behavior caused JEDEC's choice; to the extent that it may have rested on a supposition that there is a cognizable violation of the Sherman Act when a lawful monopolist's deceit has the effect of raising prices (without an effect on competitive structure), it conflicts with NYNEX. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:38 pm
Rambus, if Rambus had ex ante monopoly power prior to its allegedly deceptive acts, even assuming that those acts resulted in violation of RAND commitments and higher prices, NYNEX commands that an antitrust violation requires injury to the competitive process and not just increased prices. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm
(citing NYNEX, 525 U.S. 128). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
NYNEX [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Stafford’s behalf through the NYNEX Charitable Giving Program that is discussed below. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:08 pm
Verizon (and before them NYNEX) fought desperately to keep customers from migrating to DSL and optical services, by making sure that T1-lines (which are based on POTS service) were the only built-out infrastructure in their system. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
If not, on what grounds is NYNEX distinguishable? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Three directors served as directors of NYNEX Corporation and they are eligible for the retirement program. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
/NYNEX, 96 NY2d at 316; Murphy v American Home Prods. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:38 am
I did about three seconds of work on a matter for you when you were at Nynex, about 17 years ago) notices it and brings it to the world's attention. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 8:43 pm
Circuit applied an overly restrictive “but-for” causation standard that would require the Commission to show that Rambus’s conduct was anticompetitive (”the court of appeals erred in supposing that a Section 2 tribunal must identify a particular anticompetitive effect in order to find liability”); (2) the court erred in its application of NYNEX v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
NYNEX Service Co., 995 F.2d 355 (2d Cir. 1993).Plaintiff can prove constructive discharge because a knowledegable source -- a union representative -- told her she was going to lose the hearing. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm
The second prong, addressing RAND royalties, also suffered from an excessive reliance on the case of NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:43 am
" To reach this conclusion, the Court relied heavily on NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:43 pm
" To reach this conclusion, the Court relied heavily on NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
., 518 U.S. 231 (1996); NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
