Search for: "Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP (PT), one of New York’s largest workers’ injury firms specializing in serious personal injury cases, workers compensation claims, occupational disease claims and social security claims, has joined forces with Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik LLP (NBRS), a nationally recognized plaintiff’s law firm. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:48 am
DeFranco v Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 30952(U) March 28, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150188/2018 Judge: James E. d’Auguste describes what happens when cases are shuttled between the initial attorneys and “trial counsel”, which in this particular situation means a law firm that took all of the initial attorneys’ cases and worked them up for trial. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, a well-heeled New York plaintiff personal injury firm that had the resources to represent hundreds of plaintiffs in the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation and battle Exxon in the New York City MTBE Litigation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, a well-heeled New York plaintiff personal injury firm that had the resources to represent hundreds of plaintiffs in the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation and battle Exxon in the New York City MTBE Litigation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, a well-heeled New York plaintiff personal injury firm that had the resources to represent hundreds of plaintiffs in the World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation and battle Exxon in the New York City MTBE Litigation. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am
It is further noted that a defamation claim, as is the case here, is subject to the heightened pleading standard of CPlR 3016 (a) which states that “… the particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint, but their application to the plaintiff may be stated generally” (see Rubin v Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP, 151 AD3d 603, 604 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
