Search for: "National Electrical Benefit Fund v. Code Engineering Services, Inc."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The Court held that although the farmers are afforded certain benefits because of their right to water service, those benefits did not constitute a pre-1914 right to water. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
The state benefits from a strong manufacturing base and an educated workforce. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
“This last major funding round, I want to see the money infused into New Bedford. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
The state lawsuit alleged that the acceptance of the funds violated the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code, because some of the money collected by the Union for the job targeting program was derived from wages earned on state prevailing wage projects. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
The Bill was to be an overhaul of the compulsory licence system that governs mechanical licences in the US, with Collins and Jeffries saying: "Under the Music Modernization Act, the digital services would fund a Mechanical Licensing Collective, and, in turn, be granted blanket mechanical licenses for interactive streaming or digital downloads of musical works". [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
Clearly, law firms are significantly behind the curve, despite law enforcement agencies and cybersecurity firms issuing repeated warnings about the risks of attacks by insiders, fraudsters, hacktivists, unscrupulous competitors and nation-states. [read post]
